Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division dan Teams Games Tournament Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Materi Sistem Pencernaan Manusia Kelas VIII di MTS Kecamatan Sarang Kabupaten Rembang
Abstract
The aims of the study were to 1) determine the effect of the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model on the science learning outcomes of the Human Digestive System material on students. 2) determine the effect of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model on the science learning outcomes of the Human Digestive System material on students. 3) to find out the differences between the Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning models on the science learning outcomes of the Human Digestive System material for students. This study uses an experimental approach with a pure experimental type because of the experimental and control classes, while the design used is the pretest posttest control group design. Research results: 1) The Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) model has an effect on learning outcomes in science learning material for the human digestive system class VIII at MTs Sarang Rembang, this is based on the acquisition of a Tcount value of 13,291 > t-table 2,06390 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0, 05. 2) The Teams Games Tournament (TGT) learning model has an effect on the science learning outcomes of the VIII grade human digestive system material at MTs Sarang Rembang, this is based on the acquisition of a Tcount value of 25,485 > t-table 2,06390 and a significance level of 0.000 <0.05. 3) The TGT learning model is more effective than STAD on the science learning outcomes of class VIII human digestive system material at MTs Sarang Rembang, this is based on the Tcount value of 2.278 > Ttable 2.01063 and the significance level of 0.005 <0.05 and the mean value obtained TGT is higher than the mean value in STAD learning (86.4 > 78.66).
References
Asrori. (2015). Pengertian Pendekatan, Strategi, Metode, Teknik, Taktik,. Dan Model Pembelajaran. PT Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
Ambarini, N. 2013. Penerapan Pembelajaran Aktif Card Sort Disertai Mind Mapping Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Siswa Kelas VIIE SMP Negeri 5 Surakarta. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi. Vol. 1 (1): 1-17.
Berlin Emilia.2015). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. (cetakan pertama). Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2013. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineke. Cipta.
Depdiknas .2013. Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003.tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.
Esminarto, Sukowati, & Anam, K. (2016). Implementasi Model STAD dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siwa. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 1(November), 16–23.
Francis, Adesoji, F and Ibraheem T. 2019. Effect of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD)Stra-tegy and Mathematics knowlegde on Learning Outcomes in Chemical kinetics.The Journal of International Social Research. Vol. 2 (6): 1-20
Huda, M. (2014). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Huda, Miftahul. 2014. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Handayani, F. 2013. Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Game Tournament (TGT) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMP N 1 Purwodadi Kabupaten Pasuruan Pada Materi Keragaman Bentuk Muka Bumi. Jurnal penelitian kependidikan. Vol. 20 (2): 167-176.
Kurniasari, Ani. 2014. Komparasi Belajar Antara Siswa Dengan Metode Teams. Games Tournament (TGT) dan Student Teams Achievement Division. (STAD).Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.Vol.1 No.3 (115)
Komalasari, Kokom. 2013. “Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi”. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Kurniasih, Imas dan Sani, Berlin (2017). Ragam pengembangan model pembelajaran untuk peningkatan profesionalitas guru. Bandung: Kata Pena.
Mulyana Deddy. 2015. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja. Rosdakarya.
Nadrah. 2017. “The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Students’ Motivation toward Physics Learning Outcome”jurnal International Education Studies 10(2): 123-130.
Oludipe, D.& Jonathan, O.A. (2013). Effect of Cooperative Learning Teaching Strategy on the Reduction on Students’ Anxiety for Learning Chemistry. The Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7, 30-36.
Prastowo, Andi. 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik. Yogyakarta : Diva Press.
Ronawati.2016. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Di Kelas IV SDN 3 Tambun Tolitoli.Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako.Vol.4.No. 1
Sinambela, M. 2019. Model Pembelajaran Tean Game Tournamen (TGT) untuk mengefektifkan perkuliahan toksikologi. Jurnal pendidikan matematika dan sains. Vol. 4 (1): 41-44.
Slavin,Robert E.2015. Cooperatif Learning. Bandung: Nusa media
Sudjana, Nana . 2014. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Syah, Muhibbin, 2015, Psikologi Belajar, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa (Mendikbud), (2017), Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, Ed. 3, cet. 4, h. 408 & 121.
Wardoyo, Sigit Mangun. (2013). Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Didik. Jurnal Panrita, 10(3), 680-693.
Yamin, M. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta : Gaung Persada Press.
Zakaria, E and Iksan, Z. (2017). Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics. Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology education. Vol. 3(1) : 35-39.
