Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Proses Penyelesaian Pemilu Terkait Hasil Pemilu
Abstract
In accordance with the ruling of the Constitutional Court under Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court no longer holds the authority to adjudicate disputes concerning the outcomes of direct local elections, as the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 of 2008 are inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 157 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2015 specifies that the resolution of disputes over regional election results falls directly within the purview of a specialized judicial entity. However, prior to the establishment of such a specialized judicial entity, the Constitutional Court retained the authority to adjudicate disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections. The authority of the Constitutional Court is a temporary constitutional mandate to address legal vacuums. Hence, lawmakers must promptly establish a specialized judicial entity endowed with the authority to resolve disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections.
References
Afan Gaffar, 2005, Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, hlm 21.
Agni Indriani, 2016, "Mewujudkan Penyelenggara Pemilu Berintegritas, Suara KPU Jawa Timur", Jurnal Inspirasi Demokrasi, November, hlm 13.
Ahmadi. 2015. Analisis Konstruksi Hukum Konstitusionalitas. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 11, Nomor 3, September 2014 517 Pemilu Serentak Pada Tahun 2019. Jurnal Al-‘Adl Vol. 8 No. 1, Januari 2015
Ambardi, K. 2009. Mengungkap politik kartel. Studi tentang sistem kepartaian di Indonesia era reformasi. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia. Hlm 21
Anwar C.. 2008. Teori dan Hukum Konstitusi, Ctk. Pertama, In-TRANS Publishing, Jawa Timur . Hlm 91
B. Hestu Cipto Handoyo. 2003. Hukum Tata Negara, Kewarganegaraan, & Hak Asasi Manusia, Ctk. Pertama, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta. Hlm 42
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2012, Central Authority dan Mekanisme Koordinasi dalam Pelaksanaan Bantuan Timbal Balik dalam Masalah Pidana, BPHN, Jakarta, hlm 69.
Budiardjo. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Hlm. 70
Dahl, R. (1971). Poliarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press. Hm 73
David Held. 2004. Demokrasi dan Tatanan Global, dari Negara Modern hingga Pemerintahan Kosmopolitan, Ctk. Pertama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta. Hlm 21
Davis E.After. 2018. Pengantar Analisa Politik, LP3ES, P.T. Kincir Buana, Jakarta, Hlm. 71
Gunardi Endro, 2017, "Menyelisik Makna Integritas dan Pertentangannya dengan Korupsi", Universitas Bakrie, Volume 3, Nomor 1, Maret, hlm 131.
Hans Kelsen. 1967, Principles of International Law, New York. Hotfreinhart and Winston Inc, New York, hlm 189
Harry S Nugraha, 2018, "Gagasan Amandemen Ulang Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945", Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol. 3 (No. 1), hlm 61-85
Ida Budhiati, 2013, "Quo Vadis Demokrasi Prosedural dan Pemilu: Sebuah Refleksi Teoritis" Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 42, (No. 2), hlm 268-273
Janpatar Simamora. 2014. Menyongsong Pemilu Serentak. Jurnal Rechstvinding Volume 3 Nomor 1 April 2014
Mohtar Haboddin Dan Fathur Rahman, 2013, Gurita Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah, Yogyakarta: Kaukaba, hlm. 22.
