Implementasi Pasal 365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Tentang Pencurian Kekerasan
Abstract
People are able to find other routes by taking because of economic concerns. Due to unfulfilled needs, inclusion in widespread communication - both print and electronic - shows vacillation in different types of robbery offenses. The thieves (fraudsters) may carry out their crimes in a variety of ways or according to their standard operating procedures, which change from one error to the next. The goal of this study is to ascertain how Article 365 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) pertaining to Violent Theft and criminal responsibility for perpetrators is implemented, as well as how Article 365 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) pertaining to Violent Theft is implemented. Legal analysis along with literature review is the methodology employed. The findings indicated that robbery committed with brutality was a property defect. In order for the stolen items to remain in the hands of the perpetrator and there to be still challenges in its application, the robbery's brutality has a point of planning or working with the theft or, on the other hand, assuming there is a possibility for the perpetrator to flee.
References
Abadi, S., Abadi, S., & Bayu Aji, R. (2021). Pendampingan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kelompok Rentan. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Dan Corporate Social Responsibility (PKM-CSR), 4, 1432–1440. https://doi.org/10.37695/pkmcsr.v4i0.1285
Di, S., Resort, K., Pekanbaru, K., Sukri, B., Asril, F., & Lelana, H. (2021). DESEMBER , 2021 P – ISSN : 2657 – 0270 E – ISSN : 2656 - 3371 PERAN PENYIDIK KEPOLISIAN DALAM PENINDAKAN KEJAHATAN PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 365 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA THE ROLE OF THE POLICE INVESTIGATORS IN ACTIONING THE CRIM. 3(2), 280–296.
Ishaq, I. (2015). Sanksi Pidana Perampokan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Pidana Islam. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 15(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v15i2.2858
Penyidik, P., Menangani, D., Pidana, T., Dengan, P., Terhadap, K., Motor, S., & Theft, M. (2020). JUNCTO : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum ( Studi Kasus Pada Polrestabes Medan ). 2(April), 132–143.
Rahmadysah, A., Ramadhan, M. C., & Zulyadi, R. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Sektor Medan Labuhan. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(2), 1565–1575. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1429
Saragih, B. P. (2021). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Hak Menuntut Ganti Rugi Bagi Korban Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Menurut KUHP. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 13(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i2.272
Suari, N. M. E. P., Widyantara, I. M. M., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Saksi Mahkota dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(1), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2213.210-215
Tengku Fachreza Akhbar A, Maswandi, & Arie Kartika. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Yang Mengakibatkan Matinya Korban. JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 184.
PROBLEMATIKA PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN PENGGUNAAN KEKERASAN DI JAWA TIMUR Anton Hendrik Samudra 1. (n.d.). 1051–1061.
Wibisono, D. P. P. (2022). Upaya Polri Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Berdasarkan Pasal 365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 12(1), 146–188. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v12i1.2062
Pratama, E. P., & Susilowati, T. (2023). Application Of Law And Criminal Accountability Against Violent Theft Offenders. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 4(06), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i06.831
