INVESTIGATING THE STUDENTS’ PEER INTERACTION PATTERN TO COMPREHEND TEXT EXPLANATION IN 3STM CLASSROOM

  • Puteri Ainiyyah Nugraheni1 Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Sumarta Sumarta Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Indah Purnama Dewi Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Keywords: Student’s interaction pattern, IBIS model, 3STM (Three Stage Teaching Method), Group discussion

Abstract

This research is about investigating the students’ peer interaction patterns to comprehend text explanations in the 3STM classroom. Student interaction in group discussions can reveal how well they understand the subject. Students that actively participated in the discussion group displayed a comprehension of the material being discussed. This research employed a descriptive case study. The data was obtained by observation and interviews. The research subjects were 36 students from class XI SMA Negeri in Cikarang Barat, arranged into groups of 5-6 people. This study aims to find what patterns does the students use to deliver their comprehension through group discussion in the 3STM classrooms and what factors cause the patterns to appear. Student interaction is analyzed using the IBIS model by Kunz & Rittel (1970), and there are three elements, namely: issues, positions, and arguments. The 3STM was used in this study to assist students understanding of English texts. The results found that two interaction patterns emerged in this study Detailed Knowledge Exchange and Partial Knowledge Exchange. The emergence of these two patterns was caused by factors such as discussion partners, students' knowledge of the topic being discussed, students' courage in expressing their opinions, and a lack of mastery of English vocabulary and grammar.

References

Baharudin, S. M., & Jamalludin, H. (2014). Enhancing students’ level of critical thinking through interaction with problem-based learning and computer supported the collaborative learning environment. In Proceeding of Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling, and Simulation. Langkawi, Malaysia (Vol. 808).

Boardman, A. G., Boele, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175e195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.191.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ebadi, Toktam & Purvis, Martin. (2009). A collaborative Web-based issue based information system (IBIS) framework.

Follmer, D. J., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177e187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005.

Haryono, S. S. (2020). Modul pembeajaran SMA bahasa inggris kelas XI: tell me how and why.

Hirano, E. (2015). ‘I read, I don’t understand’: Refugees coping with academic reading. ELT Journal, 69(2), 178e187. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu068.

Hu, Q., & Huang, Y. (2015, July). The design of open learner model to improve interaction of peer assessment in online learning. In 2015 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 310-314). IEEE.

Huang, C. Q., Han, Z. M., Li, M. X., Jong, M. S. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Investigating students' interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions. Computers & Education, 140, 103589.

Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383-1392.

Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459-1468.

Jacob, S. M., & Sam, H. K. (2010, October). Analysis of interaction patterns and scaffolding practices in online discussion forums. In 2010 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education (pp. 115-118). IEEE.

Jin, T., Liu, X., & Lei, J. (2020). Developing an effective three-stage teaching method for collaborative academic reading: evidence from Chinese first-year college students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100853.

Kunz, W. and Rittel, H. W. J. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Working paper. University of California at Berkeley: 1-9.

Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50(3), 627-639.

Liu, X., Gu, M. M., & Jin, T. (2021). Strategy use in collaborative academic reading: Understanding how undergraduate students co-construct comprehension of academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211025688.

Mahrukh Bashir. 2017. Bahasa Inggris. Edisi Revisi. Indonesia: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Ed., p. 10-12. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2011), Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174.

Rittel, H. J. and Webber, M. M. (1984). "Planning problems are wicked problems." development in design methodology: 135-144.

Susanti, A., Retnaningdyah, P., Puspita Ayu, A. N., & Trisusana, A. (2020). Improving EFL Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills through Collaborative Strategic Reading in Indonesia. Online Submission, 1(2), 43-52.

Tegos, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2017). Conversational Agents Improve Peer Learning through Building on Prior Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (1), 99–111.

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121–141.

Webb, N., Franke, M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, Cl, Shin, N., & Terrou, A. (2013). Engaging with other’s mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93.

Yin Robert, K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods.

Published
2023-12-27
How to Cite
Nugraheni1P., Sumarta, S., & Dewi, I. (2023). INVESTIGATING THE STUDENTS’ PEER INTERACTION PATTERN TO COMPREHEND TEXT EXPLANATION IN 3STM CLASSROOM. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(24), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10434045