Risk Assessment on Test Sampling Work at PT. XYZ
Abstract
Good occupational health and safety (K3) needs to be done in an effort to reduce the possibility of accidents when doing work. To reduce the number of work accidents, it is necessary to control risk in the workplace through risk management, one of the methods is HIRARC. PT XYZ is a company engaged in providing environmental laboratory services. This company has several fields namely administration, analyst, test sample taker. Thearea most at risk is the part of the test sample taker. The purpose of this study is a Risk Assessment on the work of taking test samples at PT. XYZ.
This type of research is qualitative with descriptive observational method, by describing the results of hazard identification and risk assessment on the work of taking test samples, in order to obtain a recommendation for hazard risk control using the HIRARC (Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Risk Control) method. Data collection techniques were carried out by observation, in-depth interviews and documentation.
Sampling work carried out by test sampling officers PT. XYZ has 26 potential hazards. Test sample taker officer PT. XYZ has a low including the risk of skin irritation, eye irritation, minor injury, moderate includes the risk of muscle pain, fractures.and high includes the risk of injury to death, fire, heat stress, dehydration, respiratory infections. The recommended control refers to the control hierarchy, namely elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative and personal protective equipment.
The conclusion of the test sampling job shows that the hazard identification stage of this work produces 26 potential hazards and has a risk level of low, moderate, high. The recommended risk control that has the most priority is the implementation of the OHS management system because the company is required to apply 64 basic criteria
References
Afandi, M., Anggraeni, S. K., & Mariawati, A. S. (2015). Manajemen Risiko K3 Menggunakan Pendekatan HIRARC (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control) Guna Mengidentifikasi Potensi Hazard.
Arpian, I. D. (2018). Penerapan Alat Pelindung Diri Tangan pada Pekerja Bagian Produksi. Higeia Journal of Public Health Researh and Development, 2(3), 363–373. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/higeia/article/download/22804/11735
Barizqi, I. N. (2015). Hubungan Antara Kepatuhan Penggunaan APD Dengan Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja pada Pekerja Bangunan PT. Adhi Karya Utama TBK Proyek Rumah Sakit Telogorejo Semarang.
Darmawan, A. (2013). Penyakit Sistem Respirasi Akibat Kerja. 1, 68–83.
International Labour Organization. (2018). Menuju budaya pencegahan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja yang lebih kuat di Indonesia. https://www.ilo.org/jakarta/info/public/pr/WCMS_616368/lang--en/index.htm
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum RI. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 05/PRT/M/2014 Tentang Pedoman Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3) Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum, 41.
Moh. Zyahri, H. P. (2020). Pengembangan Desain Produk Trolley Menggunakan Metode Kano. 122–129.
Nurmawanti, I., Widaningrum, S., & Iqbal, M. (2015). Menggunakan Metode Hirarc Untuk Memenuhi Requirement Perkasa Controling And Identification Of Occupational Health And Safety Using HIRARC To Fullfill OHSAS 18001 : 2007 Requirement Data Kecelakaan Kerja Pt . Beton Elemenindo Perkasa Tahun 2013-2014. E-Proceeding of Engineering, 2(2), 4568–4575.
Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi. (1980). Pemeriksaan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Tenaga Kerja. 1–5.
PUPR. (2000). Menteri Negara Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia Keputusan Menteri Negara Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 10/Kpts/2000. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents.
Ramadhan, R. M., Kusnadi, & Suseno, A. (2021). Analisis Pengendalian Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Menggunakan Metode Hirarc Pada Area Produksi CV. Artana Engineering. Teknika, 15(x), 115–130. https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/teknika/article/view/3383
Ramli, S. (2010). Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Dian Rakyat.
Ramli, S. (2017). MANAJEMEN KESELAMATAN PROSES BERBASIS RISIKO. UNTUK INDUSTRI MIGAS DAN PETROKIMIA. Yayasan Pengembangan Keselamatan Prosafe Institute.
Regia, R. A., & Oginawati, K. (2017). Potensi Bahaya Debu Silika Terhadap Kesehatan Pandai Besi Desa Mekarmaju Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Dampak, 14(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.25077/dampak.14.2.73-80.2017
Saputra, S., & Erwandi, D. (2013). Analisis Hubungan Persepsi Risiko Bahaya Listrik dengan Risiko Kejadian Kebakaran pada Warga RW 07 Jl . Lautza Dalam Jakarta Pusat Tahun 2013. 1–18.
Spurlock, B. (2018). Physical Hazards of The Workplace. CRC Press.
Sukmawati, I. (2020). Potensi Bahaya pada Home Industry Konveksi. HIGEIA (Journal of Public Health Research and Development), 4(3), 384–397.
Suma’mur, P. (2014). Higiene Perusahaan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Sagung Seto.
Tarwaka. (2008). Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. HARAPAN PRESS.
Tarwaka. (2012). Dasar-dasar keselamatan kerja serta pencegahan kecelakaan di tempat kerja. Harapan Press.
Tarwaka. (2014a). Ergonomi Industri. Harapan Press.
Tarwaka. (2014b). Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja: Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. Harapan Press.
Tyas, A., Dwi, A., Hartanti, R. I., Dewi, A., & Sujoso, P. (2015). Analisis Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Petugas Pengambil Contoh Uji ( PCU ) Cerobong Boiler ( Studi Kasus di Unit Pelaksana Teknis Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Surabaya ). 1–4.
Ulfa, H. M. (2014). Analisis Manajemen Mutu Pengelolaan Rekam Medis Di Rumah Sakit Mesra Siak Hulu Kabupaten Kampar Tahun 2014. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat.
Wijaya, A., Panjaitan, T. W. S., & Palit, H. C. (2015). Evaluasi Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja dengan Metode HIRARC pada PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia. Jurnal Titra, 3(1), 29–34.
