Analisis Efektivitas Pembuatan Produk Cyclone Cone Filter pada Mesin Shearing Ysd di PT. XYZ dengan Metode Overall Equipment Effectivenees (OEE)
Abstract
PT. XYZ which is located in Karawang is engaged in filtering including textile materials, water, oil and gas. Which works closely with several other companies so as to make very high quality products. Therefore, a more efficient, structured and easier work is needed for monitoring. In this study, the preferred goal is to find out how much effective the YSD Shearing Machine is in the manufacture of Cyclone Cone Filter products with the OEE method. The results of the Research on the Effectiveness Level of the YSD Shearing Machine in the Cyclone Cone Filter Production process are 71.98% Week 1, Week 2 87.51%, Week 3 87.33%, Week 4 by 81.32%. And the average calculation result of Overall Equipment Effectiveness is 82.035%. This value does not meet the world standard of 85%.
References
B. pratama, Y. p., Afisena, D., & Sarosa, “ANALISIS PROSES PACKAGING DAN STUFFING PERUSAHAAN FURNITUR LOKAL DALAM MENJAGA EKSISTENSI PERSAINGAN GLOBAL,” Manaj. Ind. dan Logistik, vol. 2, no. 2, 2018.
“Pengertian Filter-Arti Definisi Pengertian.”arti-definisi- pegertian.info (accessed Jun. 08, 2021).
Damar Suryo Bowo, “ANALISIS PERBAIKAN PROSES PRODUKSI PADA PT SUMBER TEKNIK SENTOSA,” Dep. Manag. FEB UMM, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018.
J. S. Achmad Said, “Analisis Total Productive Maintenance Pada Lini Produksi Mesin Perkakas Guna Memperbaiki Kinerja Perusahaan,” IST AKPRIND Yogyakarta, 2008.
W. S. Akhmad Sutoni, “Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) Analysis on Lathe Machines using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness Method and Six Big Losses,” IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys., vol. 2, 2018.
E. R. Untung Mardono1, “An Analysis Of The Effect Of Elimination Of Six Big Losses On Increasing Profitability In Steel Rolling Mill Companies,” Int. J. Mech. Prod., vol. 389, 2019.
s. m anwar, “Analisis Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) dalam Meminimalisir Six Big Losses Pada Mesin Produksi di UD. Hidup Baru,” Ind. Eng. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2016.
