Literacy dalam Pembelajaran Matematika
Abstract
Mathematical literacy is an individual's capacity to identify and understand this world by playing the role of mathematics to build a strong stance, and involving mathematics according to individual needs as constructive, caring, and reflective citizens. both for the present life and for the life to come. With the target of mathematics literacy, if the learning that leads to the achievement of mathematics literacy has to change again, it is almost certain that mathematics literacy will not be achieved. The experience of participating in PISA since 2000, for every three years, Indonesian children are only satisfied with a math score of 371 (in 2000), 360 (in 2003), 391 (in 2006), 371 (in 2009), 375 (in 2009). in 2012), and 386 (2015) and 379 (2018); Indonesian children's mathematics achievement was ranked 39th out of 41 participating countries (in 2000), 38 out of 40 countries (in 2003), ranked 50 out of 57 participants (2006), ranked 61 out of 65 participating countries (in 2009) , ranking 64 out of 65 participants (in 2012), ranking 64 out of 70 countries (in 2015) while the average International mathematics score is 500.
References
(3): 191–95.
Bill Hogarth, B. & Crothers, B. (2007).Guidelines for Literacy
Cappo, M., and de Lange, J. 1999. “AssessMath!,” Santa Cruz, CA: Learning in Motion.
Cockroft, W. H. 1982. Mathematics Counts.Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
De Lange, J. 1987. Mathematics, Insight, and Meaning. Teaching, Learning, and Testing of Mathematics for the Life and Social Sciences.Utrecht: Vakgroep Onderzoek Wiskundeonderwijs en Onderwijscomputercentrum (OW&OC).
De Lange, J. 1992. “Higher Order (Un-)Teaching.” In Developments in School athematics Education around the World, edited by I. Wirszup and R. Streit, vol. 3, 49–72. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
De Lange, J. 1995. “Assessment: No Change Without Problems.” In Reform in School Mathematics and Authentic Assessment, edited by T. A. Romberg, 87–172. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
De Lange, J. 1999. Framework for Assessment in Mathematics. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science (NCISLA).
De Lange, J. 2000. “The Tides They are A-Changing.” UMAP-Journal 21(1): 15–36.
De Lange, J., ed. 1994. Rapport Studiecommissie Wiskunde B-VWO. Utrecht: Onderzoek Wiskundeonderwijs en Onderwijscomputercentrum (OW&OC).
Education Department Republic of South Africa (2008). National Curriculum Statement Grade 10-12 (General Subject Asessmen Guidelines. Mathematics literacy. Republic of South Africa
Education Department Republic of South Africa (2008). National Curriculum Statement Grade 10-12 (General Subject Asessmen Guidelines. Mathematics literacy. Republic of South Africa
Ellen S. Friedland, Susan E. McMillen, & Pixita del Prado Hill (2011). Collaborating to Cross the Mathematics–Literacy Divide: An Annotated Bibliography of Literacy Strategies for Mathematics Classrooms. In Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 55(1) September 2011, doi:10.1598/JAAL.55.1.6, International Reading Association pp. 57–66.
Ellis, Wade Jr. 2001. “Numerical Common Sense for All.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 61–66. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Ewell, Peter T. 2001. “Numeracy, Mathematics, and General Education.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 37–48. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Expert Panel on Early Math in Ontario. (2003). Early math strategy: The report of the Expert Panel on Early Math in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.
Expert Panel on Students at Risk in Ontario. (2003). Think literacy success, Grades 7–12: The report of the Expert Panel on Students at Risk in Ontario.Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.
Feijs, E. et al. 1998.“Looking at an Angle.”In Mathematics in Context. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Freudenthal, H. 1973. Mathematics as an Educational Task. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Freudenthal, H. 1979. “Een manier om veranderingen bij te houden.”Wiskrant 18: 6–7.
Hughes-Hallett, Deborah. 2001. “Achieving Numeracy: The Challenge of Implementation.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 93–98. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
International Life Skills Survey (ILSS). 2000. Policy Research Initiative. Statistics Canada.
Iswadi, H. (2016). Sekelumit Dari Hasil PISA 2015 Yang Baru Dirilis. http://www.ubaya.ac.id/2014/content/ articles_detail/230/Overview-of-the-PISA-2015-results-that-have-just-been-Released.html
Kennedy, Dan. 2001. “The Emperor’s Vanishing Clothes.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 55–60. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Lesh, R. et al. 1986. “Conceptual Models and Applied Mathematical Problem-Solving Research.” In Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Process, edited by R. Lesh and M. Landau. New York, NY: Academic Press.
LOGSE 1990.Ley de Ordenacio´n General del Sistema Educativo. Madrid.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board (MSEB). 1993. Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematical Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ministry of Education (2004).Leading Mathematics Success: Mathematics Literacy Grade 7-12. The Report of the Expert Panel on Student Success in Ontario. Canada.
Ministry of Education, 2004).Leading Mathematics Success: Mathematics Literacy Grade 7-12. The Report of the Expert Panel on Student Success in Ontario. Canada.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1993. National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2002. Framework for Mathematics Assessment. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.1999. MeasuringStudent Knowledge and Skills.A New Framework for Assessment. Paris: OECD.
Schneider, Carol Geary. 2001. “Setting Greater Expectations for Quantitative Learning.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 99 –106. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Schoenfeld, Alan H. 2001. “Reflections on an Impoverished Education.” In Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, edited by Lynn Arthur Steen, 49–54. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Steen, Lynn Arthur, ed. 2001. Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Steen, Lynn Arthur. 1990. On the Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Treffers, A. 1991.“Meeting Innumeracy at Primary School.”Educational Studies in Mathematics 22: 333–52.
Tufte, E. R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
Tufte, E. R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press.
Tufte, E. R. 1997. Visual Explanations—Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press. Mathematics for Literacy 89
White, S., and McCloskey, M. (2003). Framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2005-531). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
