Pemikiran Immanuel Kant dan Implikasinya dalam Diskursus Pendidikan Akhlak
Abstract
Kant's ethical formulation is supported by the objections of pure reason and practical ratio. Kant's introduction contains an a priori element due to this criticism of pure ratio. On the other hand, empiricism emphasizes the latter, stressing sensory knowledge. In terms of the praxis ratio, Kant's ethical axis is founded on free will, soul immortality, and the existence of God. Meeting the soul's immortality in humans entails making commitments that need either good or bad actions. Kant's fundamental ethical grounding is his deontological theory of regulation or idea of obligation, which emphasizes good deeds as obligations and ill deeds as prohibitions without regard for impact. Kant's ethics and moral education are both deontological. Kant's ethics and moral education all affirm the freedom of choice, the immortality of the soul, and the reality of God. Kant guessed but did not discover the Essence in the transcendental dimension, whereas moral education began with the Essence's meaning. Kant's ethics not being widely regarded as human ethical norms, categorical imperatives have not been adequately grounded in moral practice.
References
Abdullah, M. A. (1990). The idea of universality of ethical norms in Ghazali and Immanuel Kant.
Abdullah, M. A. (2002). Antara Al-Ghazali dan Kant: Filsafat Etika Islam, terj. Hamzah. Bandung: Mizan.
Acton, H. B. (1970). Kant’s moral philosophy. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Asdi, E. D. (1995). Imperatif kategoris dalam filsafat moral Immanuel Kant. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Bagir, H. (2005). Buku Saku Filsafat Islam. Mizan.
Bailey, O. (2010). What Knowledge is Necessary for Virtue? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 4(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26556/JESP.V4I2.40
Bertens, K. (1976). Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat. Kanisius.
Bertens, K. (2000). Pengantar etika bisnis. Kanisius.
Bertens, K. (2002). Etika, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Cet. VII.
Cox, W. J. (1952). Frederick Mayer," A History of Modern Philosophy". Philosophical Forum, 10(a).
Delfgaauw, B. (1992). Sejarah Ringkas Filsafat Barat, terj. Soejono Soemargono, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Grcic, J. (2013). Virtue theory, relativism and survival. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(4), 416.
Hadiwijono, H. (2003). Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2, cet. ke-19. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Mahmud, A. A. H. (2004). Akhlak Mulia. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Maiwan, M. (2018). Memahami Teori-teori Etika: Cakrawala dan Pandangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 17(2), 193–215.
MS, K. (2009). Filsafat Bahasa Semiotika dan Hermeneutika, Yogyakarta. Paradigma.
Praja, J. S. (2003). Aliran-aliran filsafat dan etika. Jakarta: Kencana.
Scruton, R. (1985). From Descartes to Wittgenstein. HarperCollins Publishers.
Siswanto, J. (1998). Sistem-Sistem Metafisika Barat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Strathern, P. (2001). 90 Menit Bersama Kant. Esensi.
Sudarminta, J. (2013). Etika Umum Kajian tentang beberapa masalah pokok dan teori etika normatif. Penerbit Kanisius.
Sutrisno, M., & Hardiman, B. A. (1992). Para filsuf penentu gerak zaman. Kanisius.
Tafsir, A. (1990). Filsafat Umum akal dan hati sejak Thales sampai James.
Tjahjjadi, S. P. L. (1991). Hukum Moral; Ajaran Immanuel Kant Tentang Etika Dan Imperatif Kategoris. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Yunahar, I. (2012). Kuliah Akhlak. Lembaga Pengkajian Dan Pengamalan Islam.
